<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reciprocal linking - good or bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>David Rosam on SEO copywriting, Ethical SEO and Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Thomas

"I think too many people want the easy way out of SEO" - AMEN!

Reading on, it sounds as if we're on the same page for SEO overall ;-)

Thanks for your kind comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas</p>
<p>&#8220;I think too many people want the easy way out of SEO&#8221; - AMEN!</p>
<p>Reading on, it sounds as if we&#8217;re on the same page for SEO overall <img src='http://dangerous-thinking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for your kind comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Vladimir

I'm not sure exactly what you're saying, but here goes...

If Google knows about both sites and their links, it wouldn't be too difficult to work out where reciprocal linking is going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladimir</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly what you&#8217;re saying, but here goes&#8230;</p>
<p>If Google knows about both sites and their links, it wouldn&#8217;t be too difficult to work out where reciprocal linking is going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Link exchange has really come under the gun recently. I know many that have put it in their heads that building a good link scheme is all you need to clean up your site and its rankings. 

I think too many people want the easy way out of SEO and for that have come up with the idea that Link Exchange can do that easily and make up for lack of content. Heaven knows every Real Estate agent out there has done that to some degree in the past! ;-)

I try to tell people to work on their content and keep the site interesting. Make it easy to find the content when they are there and people will start to link to them naturally...reciprocal linking just muddies things up overall. I'm glad Google has made that statement. 

Nice find on the information! Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link exchange has really come under the gun recently. I know many that have put it in their heads that building a good link scheme is all you need to clean up your site and its rankings. </p>
<p>I think too many people want the easy way out of SEO and for that have come up with the idea that Link Exchange can do that easily and make up for lack of content. Heaven knows every Real Estate agent out there has done that to some degree in the past! <img src='http://dangerous-thinking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I try to tell people to work on their content and keep the site interesting. Make it easy to find the content when they are there and people will start to link to them naturally&#8230;reciprocal linking just muddies things up overall. I&#8217;m glad Google has made that statement. </p>
<p>Nice find on the information! Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladimir</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>David,

How Google can identify links which is pointing to each other only in one way direction, it is not even 3 ways. They connects then from one to another in one way direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>How Google can identify links which is pointing to each other only in one way direction, it is not even 3 ways. They connects then from one to another in one way direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Thanks Craig

Maybe I've unintentionally muddled some issues here, and I need to be a little clearer on my POV:

Link exchanging in a manual/human fashion shouldn't upset Google - it's those automated services that Google will jump on you for.

But. Reciprocal links aren't as powerful for Organic SEO as backlinks (one-way, incoming links). That's why we don't advise our clients to invest in reciprocal links.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Craig</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ve unintentionally muddled some issues here, and I need to be a little clearer on my POV:</p>
<p>Link exchanging in a manual/human fashion shouldn&#8217;t upset Google - it&#8217;s those automated services that Google will jump on you for.</p>
<p>But. Reciprocal links aren&#8217;t as powerful for Organic SEO as backlinks (one-way, incoming links). That&#8217;s why we don&#8217;t advise our clients to invest in reciprocal links.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Lanson</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>I have been link exchanging for years with my trusty linksmanager software and I have never had a problem with google.  google is having trouble with the services that force link exchange.  dont use those.  use a software that gives you human control over who you link to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been link exchanging for years with my trusty linksmanager software and I have never had a problem with google.  google is having trouble with the services that force link exchange.  dont use those.  use a software that gives you human control over who you link to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Thanks Vladimir

Akismet thought your comment was spam; I assume it isn't, as your web site checks out and the comment is actually on a relevant post!

Speaking personally, I wouldn't touch the service with a bargepole. As I've said here before, buying links is a no-no - see Google: buying links is bad (again) (http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/06/15/google-buying-links-is-bad-again/.

Google will also do its best to identify the scheme's links and discount them.

I really wouldn't waste our clients' money.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Vladimir</p>
<p>Akismet thought your comment was spam; I assume it isn&#8217;t, as your web site checks out and the comment is actually on a relevant post!</p>
<p>Speaking personally, I wouldn&#8217;t touch the service with a bargepole. As I&#8217;ve said here before, buying links is a no-no - see Google: buying links is bad (again) (http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/06/15/google-buying-links-is-bad-again/.</p>
<p>Google will also do its best to identify the scheme&#8217;s links and discount them.</p>
<p>I really wouldn&#8217;t waste our clients&#8217; money.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladimir</title>
		<link>http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/2007/08/23/reciprocal-linking-good-or-bad/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>The reciprocal links doesn't work anymore, I found newwaylinks.com I think they will do all we need</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reciprocal links doesn&#8217;t work anymore, I found newwaylinks.com I think they will do all we need</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
